Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
August 2019

The Title X Gag Rule Is Wreaking Havoc—Just as Trump Intended

Authors

Rachel Benson Gold, Guttmacher Institute Lauren Cross, Guttmacher Institute

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

The Trump administration has punched a massive hole in the nation’s safety-net family planning program by driving out many health care providers, including those affiliated with Planned Parenthood.

It’s still too early to fully grasp the impact of the new regulations—collectively referred to as the domestic gag rule—governing the Title X program. But available records, all based off Guttmacher’s 2015 data, indicate that it could be severe. Overall, 41% of contraceptive clients served by Title X–funded providers were served at Planned Parenthood health centers.

The administration finalized its overhaul of the Title X regulations in March 2019, after nearly two years of laying the groundwork. These changes impose coercive standards of care on patients, subvert the nationwide network of family planning providers that Title X supports, and diminish access to affordable care.

On August 19, 2019, all Title X grantees were required to certify their "good faith" intent to comply with the Trump administration’s gag rule. This has forced providers to pit their ability to obtain urgently needed financial resources against their patients’ right to unbiased and complete information, counseling and referral. Whatever path providers may choose, it comes at the expense of high-quality family planning care for the four million people who rely on Title X–funded services each year.

Assessing the Damage

Without Planned Parenthood clinics supported by Title X, other types of Title X–supported sites would need to increase their contraceptive client caseloads by an average of 70%. This poses massive challenges for the rest of the safety-net family planning provider network. According to the most recent available data from 2015, without Title X–supported Planned Parenthood sites other service sites would need to compensate as follows:

  • Title X–funded federally qualified health center (FQHC) sites would have to increase their capacity to provide contraceptive services by 116%.
  • Title X–funded health department sites would need to expand their capacity to deliver these services by 31%.
  • Title X sites operated by hospitals would need to increase their capacity to provide these services by 77%.
  • Other Title X–funded sites, such as those operated by independent agencies, would have to increase their capacity to provide these services by 101%.

The extent to which Planned Parenthood’s exit would impact other Title X–funded clinics varies by state:

  • In Vermont, Planned Parenthood served 100% of contraceptive clients served at Title X–funded centers.
  • In four additional states (Connecticut, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin), Planned Parenthood served at least 75% of contraceptive clients served at Title X–funded centers.
  • In nine additional states (Alaska, Arizona, California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York and Ohio), Planned Parenthood served at least 50% of contraceptive clients served at Title X–funded centers.
  • And in 12 additional states (Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oregon and Pennsylvania), Planned Parenthood served at least 25% of contraceptive clients served at Title X–funded centers.

The impact of the gag rule extends far beyond Planned Parenthood’s departure. News sources report that state health agencies in multiple states, including Massachusetts, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, as well as the statewide private nonprofit grantee in Maine, have also exited the program, and others may join them. 

Each component of the new regulations is harmful. Taken together, the domestic gag rule is blatantly coercive and a violation of medical ethics and patients’ rights. As a cornerstone of the Trump administration’s ideological agenda against reproductive rights, the gag rule is designed to reduce access to family planning care for people with low incomes and force providers to make harmful compromises.

First published online: August 29, 2019

Share

Printer-friendly version

Read More

Policy Analysis

Title X Under Attack—Our Comprehensive Guide

Policy Analysis

Trump Administration’s Domestic Gag Rule Has Slashed the Title X Network’s Capacity by Half

Policy Analysis

Shoring Up Reproductive Autonomy: Title X’s Foundational Role

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Beyond the Rhetoric: The Real-World Impact of Attacks on Planned Parenthood and Title X

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Why We Cannot Afford to Undercut the Title X National Family Planning Program

Guttmacher Policy Review
Opinion

What the Trump Administration’s Final Regulatory Changes Mean for Title X

Health Affairs Blog
Report

Publicly Funded Contraceptive Services at U.S. Clinics, 2015

Policy Analysis

Coercion Is at the Heart of Social Conservatives’ Reproductive Health Agenda

Guttmacher Policy Review

Topic

United States

  • Contraception: Publicly Funded Family Planning

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

Domestic Gag Rule, Title X

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.