Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Contraception

Availability, practices and acceptance of postabortion contraceptive services in health facilities: A study in six states of India

Authors

Harihar Sahoo, International Institute for Population Sciences Melissa Stillman, Guttmacher Institute Jennifer J. Frost, Guttmacher Institute Rajib Acharya, Population Council Rubina Hussain, Guttmacher Institute

Objective
To assess the availability of and practices around postabortion contraceptive services in health facilities, and document women’s acceptance of postabortion contraception in six Indian states.

Study Design
We conducted a survey of 4001 public and private health facilities that provide abortion-related care in six Indian states. In this analysis, we assess the availability and range of contraceptive methods offered, the protocols and practices around postabortion contraceptive counseling, the extent to which facilities require women to adopt contraception, and contraceptive uptake among women.

Results
Although some contraceptive methods and information were available at a majority of facilities (75–97%), the range of methods was lacking and the information provided to women varied considerably by state. 8–26% of facilities required women seeking induced abortions to accept a modern contraceptive method. Only half to two-thirds of postabortion patients adopted a modern method.

Conclusion
The limited number of methods offered in facilities suggests that some women may not obtain the method they desire, or get information about the full range of methods that should be available. While contraceptive uptake should be voluntary, the requirement imposed by some facilities for women to adopt a modern contraceptive method in order to obtain an abortion must be addressed.

Implications
Some 15.6 million Indian women had an induced abortion in 2015. Understanding the provision of postabortion contraceptive services in health facilities, including counseling, is necessary to inform policies and practices to better enable women and couples to make informed decisions to prevent future unintended pregnancies.

First published on Contraception: December 4, 2019

DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.10.013
Source / Available for Purchase
Full Article Available in Contraception

Share

Topic

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception

Geography

  • Asia: India
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.