Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Fact Sheet
May 2021

The Hyde Amendment: A Discriminatory Ban on Insurance Coverage of Abortion

From the series Federal Policy Snapshots
Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee
Sex Education
Global Gag Rule and Helms Amendment
Hyde Amendment
Immigrants’ Health Insurance
Weldon Amendment

Abortion is essential health care and should be affordable for everyone, regardless of income, zip code or source of insurance. But the Hyde Amendment prohibits federal funding for abortion, preventing people enrolled in Medicaid and other public programs in most states from using their health insurance to cover abortion care. The Hyde Amendment disproportionately impacts people already facing systemic barriers to care, particularly Black, Indigenous and other people of color. To ensure it is affordable, abortion should be covered by health insurance—whether public or private and wherever a person lives—which means the Hyde Amendment and related abortion coverage bans must be eliminated.

How the Hyde Amendment works

  • The Hyde Amendment prohibits federal funds from covering abortion services for people enrolled in Medicaid, Medicare and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). It is a discriminatory policy that Congress has included in annual spending bills since 1976.
  • The Hyde Amendment currently affects people in 34 states and the District of Columbia. The remaining 16 states provide their own funding for abortion coverage for people enrolled in Medicaid.
  • One of the effects of systemic racism in this country is that most women of color are disproportionately likely to have low incomes and to be insured through Medicaid. Among women aged 15–49, 29% of Black women and 25% of Hispanic women were enrolled in Medicaid in 2019, compared with 15% of White women and 12% of Asian women.
  • Half of all women aged 15–49 with incomes below the federal poverty level were insured through Medicaid in 2019; for Black women in that group, the proportion was 62%.
  • Across the 34 states and the District of Columbia where it currently has an impact, the Hyde Amendment leaves 7.8 million women aged 15–49 with Medicaid coverage but without abortion coverage. Half of those affected are women of color.
  • Another cruel consequence of the Hyde Amendment is that related bans withhold abortion coverage from millions of people who obtain their health coverage or care through other federal programs, including federal employees, military personnel and veterans, people imprisoned or detained by the federal government, Native Americans, Peace Corps volunteers and people with low incomes living in the District of Columbia.
Close window

Share this image:

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
Close window

Share this image:

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook

Impact of the Hyde Amendment

  • On average, an abortion at 10 weeks costs around $550, which could be someone’s entire monthly rent payment, and the cost increases as a pregnancy progresses.
  • Many people living with low incomes experience delays obtaining abortion care because of time and effort spent to gather the necessary funds: Fifty-four percent of women in the University of California, San Francisco’s Turnaway Study (which examined the consequences of continuing an unwanted pregnancy compared with receiving an abortion) reported that having to raise money for an abortion delayed their care.
  • People seeking an abortion can get caught in a cruel cycle, in which delays associated with raising the money can lead to additional costs and subsequent delays.
  • Among women with Medicaid coverage subject to the Hyde Amendment, one in four who seek an abortion are forced to continue the pregnancy. 
  • Women who do not obtain an abortion they wanted have four times greater odds of subsequently living in poverty and three times greater odds of being unemployed six months later, compared with women who are able to obtain an abortion.

What policymakers can do

To promote equitable access to abortion care, Congress and the Biden-Harris administration must ensure it is affordable for everyone who wants to end a pregnancy. This requires a number of steps, including:

  • Removing the Hyde Amendment and related coverage bans from annual spending bills.
  • Passing the Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance (EACH) Act to ensure people can obtain insurance coverage of abortion whether they get their coverage or care through Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP or other public programs. The EACH Act would also lift federal restrictions that interfere with private insurance coverage of abortion under the Affordable Care Act and ensure that the federal government does not interfere with insurance coverage of abortion by states, local governments or private health plans.
  • Passing the Health Equity and Access under the Law (HEAL) for Immigrant Families Act, which, among other things, would enable all lawfully present immigrants and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients to enroll in Medicaid and CHIP if they are otherwise eligible.
  • Expanding comprehensive health insurance coverage to those who are currently uninsured. Whether this is done through the Biden-Harris plan or a broader approach like Medicare for All, Congress and the administration must ensure that coverage applies to the full range of reproductive health care, including abortion.
From the series Federal Policy Snapshots

Share

Download Fact Sheet

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Read More

Resource

U.S. Policy Resources on Abortion

Initiative

The Path Ahead: Restoring and Advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

State Laws and Policies

State Funding of Abortion Under Medicaid

Policy Analysis

In Real Life: Federal Restrictions on Abortion Coverage and the Women They Impact

Guttmacher Policy Review
Report

Restrictions on Medicaid Funding for Abortions: A Literature Review

Topic

United States

  • Abortion: Insurance Coverage

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

Hyde Amendment, Medicaid
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.